NPB · SportsGap
Slate
3 games
NPB · research only
Moneyline leans
182-162-5
-9.1% flat 1u · 349 games since 07/16
Totals leans
195-151-16
+5.1% flat 1u · 362 games since 07/16
Team totals leans
379-360
-5.5% flat 1u · 739 picks since 07/16
ORIX@SoftBank
MLSoftBank-14962.6%+4.6✗
TotalU 6.5≈+10152.9%+5.0✓
TTORIX U 2.5≈+10852.1%+6.2✓
TTSoftBank U 3.5≈-12554.5%+1.5✓
Chunichi@Yakult
MLYakult-11654.3%+2.1✗
TotalU 8≈-13471.4%+16.2✗
TTChunichi U 3.5≈-11362.9%+12.2✗
TTYakult U 3.5≈-11152.6%+2.4✗
Hiroshima@Giants
MLGiants-15955.6%-4.0✓
TotalO 5.5-11056.6%+6.2✓
TTHiroshima U 2.5≈-13752.1%-3.1✗
TTGiants O 2.5-13656.2%+1.2✓
How to read this page

Each row is one game. Model is our model's probability that its pick wins. Book is the probability the sportsbook's price implies once its built-in margin (the vig) is removed, so the two sides add up to 100%. Gap is model minus book, in percentage points: a positive gap means the model likes the pick more than the market does, and the bigger the gap, the more they disagree.

Totals are the combined runs both teams score, over or under the posted number; team totals count one team's runs only. Units is the suggested stake, where 1 unit is whatever amount you normally bet; Pass means no bet. Once a game is final, a green row means the model's pick won and red means it lost. Every result is graded at the price posted before first pitch, and no pick is ever removed afterwards.

A gap is a disagreement, not a guarantee: the market is often right, and good picks still lose often. Never bet more than you can afford to lose.

Research only: no units. Since mid-July the book's prices have been more accurate than the NPB model in every market. The totals model was updated on Oct 5, 2026; its leans are shown and graded here, but nothing is staked until it has a record of its own.

NPB Moneylines

Model win probability for its pick vs. the book's price with the vig removed. Gap is in percentage points.

1-2 · model leans
GameAway / HomeModel pickModelBookGapResult
ORIX@SoftBank
ORIX at SoftBank
+131 / -149SoftBank
62.6%
58.0%+4.6Lost ✗
Chunichi@Yakult
Chunichi at Yakult
+103 / -116Yakult
54.3%
52.2%+2.1Lost ✗
Hiroshima@Giants
Hiroshima at Giants
+140 / -159Giants
55.6%
59.6%-4.0Won ✓

NPB Totals

Model probability on its side of the posted total vs. the book's no-vig price. ≈ marks an under price derived from the over price.

2-1 · model leans
GameTotalOver / UnderLeanModelBookGapResult
Chunichi@Yakult
Chunichi at Yakult
8+115 / ≈-134Under
71.4%
55.2%+16.2Lost ✗
Hiroshima@Giants
Hiroshima at Giants
5.5-110 / ≈-106Over
56.6%
50.4%+6.2Won ✓
ORIX@SoftBank
ORIX at SoftBank
6.5-118 / ≈+101Under
52.9%
47.9%+5.0Won ✓

NPB Team Totals

Each team's runs over or under its posted team total: model vs. the book's no-vig price.

3-3 · model leans
GameTeamTotalOver / UnderLeanModelBookGapResult
Chunichi@Yakult
Chunichi at Yakult
Chunichi3.5-107 / ≈-113Under
62.9%
50.6%+12.2Lost ✗
Chunichi@Yakult
Chunichi at Yakult
Yakult3.5-109 / ≈-111Under
52.6%
50.2%+2.4Lost ✗
Hiroshima@Giants
Hiroshima at Giants
Hiroshima2.5+113 / ≈-137Under
52.1%
55.2%-3.1Lost ✗
Hiroshima@Giants
Hiroshima at Giants
Giants2.5-136 / ≈+112Over
56.2%
55.0%+1.2Won ✓
ORIX@SoftBank
ORIX at SoftBank
ORIX2.5-131 / ≈+108Under
52.1%
45.9%+6.2Won ✓
ORIX@SoftBank
ORIX at SoftBank
SoftBank3.5+103 / ≈-125Under
54.5%
53.0%+1.5Won ✓
Model's pick wonLost